@article{10997be746ea43498d8589254c1afdba,
title = "The impact of life stage and societal culture on subordinate influence ethics: A study of Brazil, China, Germany, and the U.S.",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate the effects of societal values and life stage on subordinate influence ethics. Based on the evolving crossvergence theory of macro-level predictors of values evolution, we demonstrate the applicability of crossvergence theory in the micro-level context. Furthermore, our study provides the first empirical multi-level analysis of influence ethics utilizing a multiple-country sample. Thus, we illustrate how the breath of crossvergence can be expanded to provide a multi-level theoretical foundation of values and behavior evolution across cultures. Specifically, we integrate micro-level life stage theory and macro-level societal culture theory to concurrently assess the contributions of each theory in explaining subordinate influence ethics across the diverse societies of Brazil, China, Germany and the U.S. Consistent with previous research, we found significant societal differences in influence ethics. However, we also found that life stage theory played a significant role in understanding influence ethics. Thus, our findings expand the crossvergence perspective on societal change, indicating that key micro-level predictors (e.g., life stage) should be included in cross-cultural research.",
keywords = "Brazil, China, Crossvergence, Ethics, Germany, Influence, Life stage, U.S.",
author = "Ralston, {David A.} and Egri, {Carolyn P.} and Tania Casado and Pingping Fu and Florian Wangenheim",
note = "Funding Information: Based on societal-level crossvergence theory, it was predicted that for organizationally beneficial behavior ( Hypothesis 2a ), the U.S. respondents would be significantly higher than the German and Brazilian respondents, who would be significantly higher than the Chinese respondents. The results showed that the U.S. respondents were significantly higher than the German respondents, who were significantly higher than the Brazilian and Chinese respondents. However, the Brazilian respondents, albeit numerically higher, did not score significantly higher than the Chinese respondents. Thus, Hypothesis 2a was partially supported. For self-indulgent behavior ( Hypothesis 2b ) and destructive behavior ( Hypothesis 2c ), it was predicted that the Chinese respondents would be significantly higher than the German and Brazilian respondents, who would be significantly higher than the U.S. respondents. The results indicated that the German and Chinese respondents scored significantly higher than the Brazilian and U.S. respondents. Since the Chinese and German respondents being significantly higher than the Brazilian respondents were the only aspects of these hypotheses that were supported, Hypotheses 2b and 2c were marginally supported. Overall, significant differences were found for all three influence dimensions, but varying degrees of support were found for the hypotheses. ",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.intman.2009.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "374--386",
journal = "Journal of International Management",
issn = "1075-4253",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",
}