The distribution of lung cancer across sectors of society in the United Kingdom: A study using national primary care data

Barbara Iyen-Omofoman, Richard B. Hubbard, Chris J.P. Smith, Emily Sparks, Emma Bradley, Alison Bourke, Laila J. Tata

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)


Background: There is pressing need to diagnose lung cancer earlier in the United Kingdom (UK) and it is likely that research using computerised general practice records will help this process. Linkage of these records to area-level geo-demographic classifications may also facilitate case ascertainment for public health programmes, however, there have as yet been no extensive studies of data validity for such purposes. Methods. To first address the need for validation, we assessed the completeness and representativeness of lung cancer data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) national primary care database by comparing incidence and survival between 2000 and 2009 with the UK National Cancer Registry and the National Lung Cancer Audit Database. Secondly, we explored the potential of a geo-demographic social marketing tool to facilitate disease ascertainment by using Experian's Mosaic Public Sector classification, to identify detailed profiles of the sectors of society where lung cancer incidence was highest. Results: Overall incidence of lung cancer (41.4/100, 000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 40.6-42.1) and median survival (232 days) were similar to other national data; The incidence rate in THIN from 2003-2006 was found to be just over 93% of the national cancer registry rate. Incidence increased considerably with area-level deprivation measured by the Townsend Index and was highest in the North-West of England (65.1/100, 000 person-years). Wider variations in incidence were however identified using Mosaic classifications with the highest incidence in Mosaic Public Sector types 'Cared-for pensioners, ' 'Old people in flats' and 'Dignified dependency' (191.7, 174.2 and 117.1 per 100, 000 person-years respectively). Conclusions: Routine electronic data in THIN are a valid source of lung cancer information. Mosaic identified greater incidence differentials than standard area-level measures and as such could be used as a tool for public health programmes to ascertain future cases more effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Article number857
JournalBMC Public Health
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'The distribution of lung cancer across sectors of society in the United Kingdom: A study using national primary care data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this