TY - JOUR
T1 - An institutional approach to election campaigning in Taiwan
AU - Rawnsley, Gary D.
N1 - Funding Information:
* Gary Rawnsley is Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Nottingham, and Director of the Institute of Asia—Pacific Studies. His research focuses on political communication and democratisation with particular reference to Taiwan. Among Dr Rawnsley’s many publications are Radio Diplomacy and Propaganda (1996) and Taiwan’s Informal Diplomacy and Propaganda (2000). He is the editor of Cold War Propaganda in the 1950s (1999), and co-editor of The Clandestine Cold War in Asia (1999) and Political Communications in Greater China: The Construction and Reflection of Identity (2002). With Ming-Yeh Rawnsley, he is the author of Critical Security, Democratisation and Television in Taiwan (2001). In 2000, he was a visiting research professor at National Sun Yat-sen University in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, and is a board member of the American Association of Chinese Studies. The author would like to thank the following for funding the research in Taiwan: the University of Nottingham, the EU—China Academic Network, and the Nuffield Foundation. The author also acknowledges the Graduate Institute of Political Science at National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, where he was a visiting scholar, May—September 2000. He is grateful to colleagues at the University of Nottingham for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper, especially Richard Aldrich, Siobhan Daly, Erik Jones, Paul Heywood, Mathew Humphrey, Subrata Mitra, Andrew Robinson, and Ming-Yeh Rawnsley. Thanks also to Neil Renwick of Nottingham Trent University.
PY - 2003/11
Y1 - 2003/11
N2 - This article analyses trends in election campaigning in Taiwan with particular reference to the landmark 2000 presidential election, when the Kuomintang's 50-year monopoly on power finally ended. It examines the growing professionalism in election campaigning that stands alongside, and is shaped by, the systemic and institutional features of Taiwan's electoral landscape, such as the path dependency of the parties and the electoral system used. The article challenges us to reconsider the notion of how identity is shaped and communicated; globalisation has given birth to a spurious catch-all notion of 'Americanisation' that is invoked by many modern election observers. It is said to describe a trend towards a global convergence of electoral practices based on the adoption of election campaign techniques developed in the United States. The discourse on Americanisation resonates with the pejorative vocabulary more associated with cultural imperialism, suggesting the displacement of the indigenous by the foreign. The article is a warning against using this discourse too liberally. The flows of influence and information are in fact multi-directional, with the United States absorbing cultural effects as well as supplying them. Newly democratising systems have not undergone a blanket Americanisation because, as the Taiwan example clearly demonstrates, traditional methods of voter mobilisation remain important; the foreign coexists with the indigenous.
AB - This article analyses trends in election campaigning in Taiwan with particular reference to the landmark 2000 presidential election, when the Kuomintang's 50-year monopoly on power finally ended. It examines the growing professionalism in election campaigning that stands alongside, and is shaped by, the systemic and institutional features of Taiwan's electoral landscape, such as the path dependency of the parties and the electoral system used. The article challenges us to reconsider the notion of how identity is shaped and communicated; globalisation has given birth to a spurious catch-all notion of 'Americanisation' that is invoked by many modern election observers. It is said to describe a trend towards a global convergence of electoral practices based on the adoption of election campaign techniques developed in the United States. The discourse on Americanisation resonates with the pejorative vocabulary more associated with cultural imperialism, suggesting the displacement of the indigenous by the foreign. The article is a warning against using this discourse too liberally. The flows of influence and information are in fact multi-directional, with the United States absorbing cultural effects as well as supplying them. Newly democratising systems have not undergone a blanket Americanisation because, as the Taiwan example clearly demonstrates, traditional methods of voter mobilisation remain important; the foreign coexists with the indigenous.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344984277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1067056032000117740
DO - 10.1080/1067056032000117740
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0344984277
SN - 1067-0564
VL - 12
SP - 765
EP - 779
JO - Journal of Contemporary China
JF - Journal of Contemporary China
IS - 37
ER -