Abiraterone for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhi Rui Zhou, Shi Xin Liu, Tian Song Zhang, Jun Xia, Bo Li

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Although most prostate cancers initially respond to castration with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogues or bilateral orchiectomy, progression eventually occurs. Based on the exciting results of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it seems that patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) might benefit more from treatment withabiraterone. Therefore we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of abiraterone in the treatment of mCRPC. Methods: Literature was searched from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to July, 2013. Quality of the study was evaluated according to the Cochrane's risk of bias of randomized controlled trial (RCT) tool, then the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System was used to rate the level of evidence. Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis. Summary data from RCTs comparing abiraterone plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone for mCRPC were meta-analyzed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (RPFS) and time to PSA progression (TTPP); Pooled risk ratios (RR) for PSA response rate, objective response rate and adverse event were calculated. Results: Ten trials were included in the systematic review; Data of 2,283 patients (1,343 abiraterone; 940 placebo) from two phase 3 trials: COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302 were meta-analyzed. Compared with placebo, abiraterone significantly prolonged OS (HR, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.84), RPFS (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.74) and time to PSA progression (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.70); it also significantly increased PSA response rate (RR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.72 to 7.65) and objective response rate (RR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.51 to 6.15). This meta-analysis suggested that the adverse events caused by abiraterone are acceptable and can be controlled. Conclutios: Abiraterone significantly prolonged OS, RPFS and time to progression patients with mCRPC, regardless of prior chemotherapy or whether chemotherapy-naïve, and no unexpected toxicity was evident. Abiraterone can serve as a new standard therapy for mCRPC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1313-1320
Number of pages8
JournalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Abiraterone
  • Castration-resistant
  • Efficacy
  • Meta-analysis
  • Prostate cancer
  • Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abiraterone for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this