TY - JOUR
T1 - Radicalising global IR: modernity, capitalism, and the question of Eurocentrism
T2 - Modernity, Capitalism, and the Question of Eurocentrism
AU - Duzgun, Eren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Theorising a non-Eurocentric “global international relations” has been a main preoccupation of scholars associated with international political sociology (IPS). In this article, I argue that scholars within the IPS tradition have provided a powerful critique of, but no clear alternative to, Eurocentrism. This is partly attributable to their insufficient problematisation of the historical narratives that propel capitalism backwards into history. By problematising “presentist” conceptions of capitalism, I show that a critical dialogue between IPS and “political Marxism” helps to introduce an alternative foundation for anti-Eurocentrism, which shifts our focus from “capitalist modernity” to “radical modernity”. Radical modernity resists hierarchical-colonial ontologies by emphasising the universality of egalitarian social patterns rooted in our common, non-capitalist past. I contend that radical modernity is an enduring legacy that is found universally, transmitted interactively, and revitalised continuously across time and space, hence providing an alternative base on which to theorise and globalise the “international” in a non-Eurocentric way.
AB - Theorising a non-Eurocentric “global international relations” has been a main preoccupation of scholars associated with international political sociology (IPS). In this article, I argue that scholars within the IPS tradition have provided a powerful critique of, but no clear alternative to, Eurocentrism. This is partly attributable to their insufficient problematisation of the historical narratives that propel capitalism backwards into history. By problematising “presentist” conceptions of capitalism, I show that a critical dialogue between IPS and “political Marxism” helps to introduce an alternative foundation for anti-Eurocentrism, which shifts our focus from “capitalist modernity” to “radical modernity”. Radical modernity resists hierarchical-colonial ontologies by emphasising the universality of egalitarian social patterns rooted in our common, non-capitalist past. I contend that radical modernity is an enduring legacy that is found universally, transmitted interactively, and revitalised continuously across time and space, hence providing an alternative base on which to theorise and globalise the “international” in a non-Eurocentric way.
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac012
U2 - doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac012
DO - doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141140462
SN - 1750-8916
VL - 15
SP - 313
EP - 333
JO - The Chinese Journal of International Politics
JF - The Chinese Journal of International Politics
IS - 3
M1 - poac012
ER -