Abstract
The implementation of the parallel management method for Corporate Average Fuel Consumption (CAFC) and New Energy Vehicles (NEV) Credits (thereafter “the dual-credit policy”) has increased the pressure on conventional automakers, although multiple ways to comply with this policy exist. We develop a decision-making model to optimize the fuel economy improvement level and the production of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) under the dual-credit policy. Combined with theoretical analysis and numerical simulation methods, the effects of the dual-credit policy on the enterprise level are discussed. The implementation of the dual-credit policy may not be able to help automakers improve the fuel economy of ICEVs or reduce the production of high fuel consumption vehicles (HFCVs). When the year-end NEV credit of an automaker does not meet the standard, the dual-credit policy is not conducive to the production of energy-efficient vehicles, but increases HFCV production. We recommend that the policy should decouple the standard of an NEV credit from ICEV production and establish a reasonable upper and lower limit for the price of credit transactions. We also suggest that different NEV accounting discount multiples should be established for different automakers, as a one-size-fits-all policy is not necessarily optimized.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104712 |
Journal | Resources, Conservation and Recycling |
Volume | 156 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2020 |
Keywords
- Corporate average fuel consumption
- Dual-credit policy
- Fuel economy
- Internal combustion engine vehicles
- New energy vehicles
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Economics and Econometrics