TY - JOUR
T1 - Discussion of "Radial strain behaviors and stress state interpretation of soil under direct simple shear" by X. Kang, Y. Cheng, and L. Ge. the regular article was published in journal of testing and evaluation, vol. 43, no. 6, 2015, pp. 1594-1601, doi:10.1520/JTE20140202. ISSN 0090-3973
AU - Li, Y.
AU - Yang, Y. M.
AU - Roberts, G. W.
AU - Yu, H. S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 by ASTM International.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Two methods were used in determining the stress state of simple shear tests in the discussed paper. The authors stated that the second method was proposed by Oda and Konishi, based on the distribution law of contact force (Oda, M. and Konishi, J., "Rotation of Principal Stresses in Granular Material During Simple," Soils and Foundations., Vol. 14, No. 4, 1974, pp. 39-53.). However, the relation used in the method was found by Roscoe et al. from experimental results (Roscoe, K. H., Bassett, R. H., and Cole, E. R. L., "Principal Axes Observed During Simple Shear of a Sand," Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference on Shear Strength Properties of Natural Soils and Rocks, Vol. 1, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, 1967, pp. 231-237.). In addition, the determination of the constant k, which used k = 1 - K0, was problematic in the discussed paper. First, the equation could only be deduced after some assumptions were made. Second, the value of k was not a constant if the K0 changed.
AB - Two methods were used in determining the stress state of simple shear tests in the discussed paper. The authors stated that the second method was proposed by Oda and Konishi, based on the distribution law of contact force (Oda, M. and Konishi, J., "Rotation of Principal Stresses in Granular Material During Simple," Soils and Foundations., Vol. 14, No. 4, 1974, pp. 39-53.). However, the relation used in the method was found by Roscoe et al. from experimental results (Roscoe, K. H., Bassett, R. H., and Cole, E. R. L., "Principal Axes Observed During Simple Shear of a Sand," Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference on Shear Strength Properties of Natural Soils and Rocks, Vol. 1, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, 1967, pp. 231-237.). In addition, the determination of the constant k, which used k = 1 - K0, was problematic in the discussed paper. First, the equation could only be deduced after some assumptions were made. Second, the value of k was not a constant if the K0 changed.
KW - Direct simple shear
KW - K
KW - Shear behavior
KW - Stress state interpretation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029116008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1520/JTE20150447
DO - 10.1520/JTE20150447
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029116008
SN - 0090-3973
VL - 45
SP - 720
EP - 721
JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
IS - 2
ER -