Comparing the New Earnings Survey (NES) and the Labour Force Survey (LFS): An analysis of the differences between the data sets and their implications for the pattern of geographical pay in the UK

Ada H.Y. Ma, Elizabeth Roberts, Robert F. Elliott, David Bell, Anthony Scott

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparing the New Earnings Survey (NES) and the Labour Force Survey (LFS): an analysis of the differences between the data sets and their implications for the pattern of geographical pay in the UK, Regional Studies, 645-665. The Labour Force Survey (LFS) and the New Earnings Survey (NES) are the most widely used data sets for analysing pay in Britain. The paper details the key differences between the two and assesses the impact of their use for studying geographical wage differences. The pattern observed is sensitive to the differences in data sets, to differences in the sample populations, the questions asked about pay and working hours, and how hourly pay is measured. Recommendations are made on which data set should be used for what purposes as well as comments on the expected improvements that will result from the introduction of the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-665
Number of pages21
JournalRegional Studies
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings (ASHE)
  • Geographical
  • Labour Force Survey (LFS)
  • New Earnings Survey (NES)
  • Regional
  • Spatial
  • Wage differentials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Environmental Science
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the New Earnings Survey (NES) and the Labour Force Survey (LFS): An analysis of the differences between the data sets and their implications for the pattern of geographical pay in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this