Comparative study of two novel fluidized beds-HDCFB and CTFB

Lanling Yan; Jingxu Zhu; Xingying Lan; Jinsen Gao

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011

Comparative study of two novel fluidized beds-HDCFB and CTFB

Lanling Yan, Jingxu Zhu, Xingying Lan, Jinsen Gao

Research output: Journal Publication › Review article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High-density circulating fluidized bed (HDCFB) and circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) have many advantages comparing to the conventional circulating fluidized bed. This paper introduces HDCFB and CTFB from such aspects, as experimental facilities, operating principles, flow structures and comparisons with other flow regimes. In HDCFB and CTFB, one could obtain high solids concentration, high heat and mass transfer efficiency, high gas and solids contacting efficiency, less solids backmixing, and more uniform flow structure. As such, high production efficiency and better product quality can be achieved, which is very important for industrial applications. Comparing HDCFB and CTFB, CTFB has more advantages and better industrial applications.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2495-2503
Number of pages	9
Journal	Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal
Volume	65
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011
Publication status	Published - Jul 2014
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Flow
Fluidized bed
Reactors
Turbulence
Voidage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Chemistry
General Chemical Engineering

Access to Document

10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011

Cite this

@article{f688f517509d416183ac8c374c1396a8,

title = "Comparative study of two novel fluidized beds-HDCFB and CTFB",

abstract = "High-density circulating fluidized bed (HDCFB) and circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) have many advantages comparing to the conventional circulating fluidized bed. This paper introduces HDCFB and CTFB from such aspects, as experimental facilities, operating principles, flow structures and comparisons with other flow regimes. In HDCFB and CTFB, one could obtain high solids concentration, high heat and mass transfer efficiency, high gas and solids contacting efficiency, less solids backmixing, and more uniform flow structure. As such, high production efficiency and better product quality can be achieved, which is very important for industrial applications. Comparing HDCFB and CTFB, CTFB has more advantages and better industrial applications.",

keywords = "Flow, Fluidized bed, Reactors, Turbulence, Voidage",

author = "Lanling Yan and Jingxu Zhu and Xingying Lan and Jinsen Gao",

year = "2014",

month = jul,

doi = "10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

pages = "2495--2503",

journal = "Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal",

issn = "0438-1157",

publisher = "Chemical Industry Press",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative study of two novel fluidized beds-HDCFB and CTFB

AU - Yan, Lanling

AU - Zhu, Jingxu

AU - Lan, Xingying

AU - Gao, Jinsen

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - High-density circulating fluidized bed (HDCFB) and circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) have many advantages comparing to the conventional circulating fluidized bed. This paper introduces HDCFB and CTFB from such aspects, as experimental facilities, operating principles, flow structures and comparisons with other flow regimes. In HDCFB and CTFB, one could obtain high solids concentration, high heat and mass transfer efficiency, high gas and solids contacting efficiency, less solids backmixing, and more uniform flow structure. As such, high production efficiency and better product quality can be achieved, which is very important for industrial applications. Comparing HDCFB and CTFB, CTFB has more advantages and better industrial applications.

AB - High-density circulating fluidized bed (HDCFB) and circulating turbulent fluidized bed (CTFB) have many advantages comparing to the conventional circulating fluidized bed. This paper introduces HDCFB and CTFB from such aspects, as experimental facilities, operating principles, flow structures and comparisons with other flow regimes. In HDCFB and CTFB, one could obtain high solids concentration, high heat and mass transfer efficiency, high gas and solids contacting efficiency, less solids backmixing, and more uniform flow structure. As such, high production efficiency and better product quality can be achieved, which is very important for industrial applications. Comparing HDCFB and CTFB, CTFB has more advantages and better industrial applications.

KW - Flow

KW - Fluidized bed

KW - Reactors

KW - Turbulence

KW - Voidage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904897925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011

DO - 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.07.011

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84904897925

SN - 0438-1157

VL - 65

SP - 2495

EP - 2503

JO - Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal

JF - Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal

IS - 7

ER -

Comparative study of two novel fluidized beds-HDCFB and CTFB

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this