Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development

Research output: Journal PublicationConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

This research paper presents the review of two renewable energy strategies, Feed In Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), in China and other countries. The two FIT schemes, which are Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz (EEG) in Germany and Benchmark Grid Electricity Prices (BGEP) in China, are compared. On the other hand, three RPS schemes, which are California's RPS Program, Australia's Renewable Energy Target (RET), and China's Weighting of Responsibility for Renewable Energy Electricity Consumption (WRREEC) framework are reviewed and discussed. Based on the review and findings, recommendations on the future development of renewable energy strategies in China are presented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Proceedings
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Event9th Applied Energy Symposium: Low Carbon Cities and Urban Energy Systems, CUE 2023 - Tokyo, Japan
Duration: 2 Sept 20237 Sept 2023

Keywords

  • China
  • Feed In Tariffs
  • Renewable Portfolio Standards
  • Carbon peak
  • Carbon neutrality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Fuel Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this