Am i afraid of my peers? understanding the antecedents of information privacy concerns in the online social context

Jin Chen, Yunjie Xu, Wenjie Ping, Bernard C.Y. Tan

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Privacy concerns about peer's disclosure of one's information (PCAPD) loom as social networking sites (SNSs) getting popular. PCAPD is different from and more complex than privacy concerns in e-commerce contexts. Based on the Communication Privacy Management theory, we propose that decisional control helps reduce a SNS member' PCAPD, and that this effect is contingent on two factors - the overlap between the discloser's social network and that of the disclosed, and information exclusivity. Laboratory experiments were carried out to test the hypotheses. The results showed that decisional control reduces a member's PCAPD. When the discloser's social networks overlaps with that of the disclosed, the effect of decisional control on PCAPD is stronger than when the two do not overlap. In addition, information exclusivity increases PCAPD. This study extends privacy research to the online social network context. It also suggests pragmatic strategies for SNSs to alleviate members' privacy concerns.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event30th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2009 - Phoenix, AZ, United States
Duration: 15 Dec 200918 Dec 2009

Conference

Conference30th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPhoenix, AZ
Period15/12/0918/12/09

Keywords

  • Communication privacy management
  • Decisional control
  • Information exclusivity
  • Information privacy concerns
  • Privacy boundary
  • Social network overlap
  • Social networking sites

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Am i afraid of my peers? understanding the antecedents of information privacy concerns in the online social context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this