The action research vs design science debate: Reflections from an intervention in eGovernment

Nikolaos Papas, Robert M. O'Keefe, Philip Seltsikas

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As Design Science (DS) establishes itself as an acceptable approach to Information Systems research, many have commented on the similarity, or otherwise, between DS and Action Research (AR). Most of the writing on this topic has been conceptual, and not grounded in practice. In this paper, we present a piece of completed research that was perceived and executed as AR, but also reflected upon as DS. The research produced a new method for diagramming electronic workflows and creating the associated digital signatures, within the domain of eGovernment. Our conclusion is that AR that produces an artefact can be quite easily, and perhaps superficially, presented as DS. Epistemologically, there is little to separate the two methodologies. However, there are some subtle differences in practice, especially with regard to the role of the artefact, the structuring of the process, the focus of evaluation of the intervention and research, and the emphasis on learning and knowledge. We provide guidance to researchers contemplating either approach, and also consider the role of pluralist attempts to combine the approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-159
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Information Systems
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Action Research
  • Design Science
  • pluralism
  • research methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Information Systems and Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The action research vs design science debate: Reflections from an intervention in eGovernment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this