How do patient and hospital features influence outcomes in small-cell lung cancer in England

A. L. Rich, L. J. Tata, C. M. Free, R. A. Stanley, M. D. Peake, D. R. Baldwin, R. B. Hubbard

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Our aim was to systematically determine how features of patients and hospitals influence access to chemotherapy and survival for people with small-cell lung cancer in England. Methods: We linked the National Lung Cancer Audit and Hospital Episode Statistics and used multiple logistic and Cox regression analyses to assess the influence of patient and hospital features on small-cell lung cancer outcomes. Results: There were 7845 patients with histologically proven small-cell lung cancer. Sixty-one percent (4820) of the patients received chemotherapy. Increasing age, worsening performance status, extensive stage and greater comorbidity all reduced the likelihood of receiving chemotherapy. There was wide variation in access to chemotherapy between hospitals in general and patients first seen in centres with a strong interest in clinical trials had a higher odds of receiving chemotherapy (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06, 1.90). Chemotherapy was associated with a lower mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.46, 0.56). Conclusion: Patients first seen at a hospital with a keen interest in clinical trials are more likely to receive chemotherapy, and chemotherapy was associated with improved survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)746-752
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • chemotherapy
  • epidemiology
  • small-cell lung cancer
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'How do patient and hospital features influence outcomes in small-cell lung cancer in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this