Abstract
Objectives
Rapid growth in pharmaceutical spending is a major challenge in Canada. To control rising costs, the Canadian government implemented a generic pricing policy in 2013, which reduced prices for some prescription generic drugs by roughly 50 percent. This paper explores the effects of the Canadian pricing policy on drug expenditures and drug utilization among seniors.
Methods
Using a unique prescription claims data, this paper adopts a difference-in-differences methodology to estimate the policy effects, and further investigates the mechanisms by exploring the demand-side incentives and the role of health insurance design with a triple-difference approach.
Results
Exploiting the policy variation across drugs and provinces, my results suggest that the policy has reduced drug expenditure per capita, largely due to the inelastic demand among seniors. Although the policy leads to lower out-of-pocket costs for seniors facing co-insurance than for those with a fixed co-payment, individual utilization and total demand display no differences across cost-sharing.
Conclusions
The price regulation in Canada was successful in reducing drug expenditures per capita. The success rests on the interaction with demand-side regulations and demand incentives. The evidence of cost containment in Canada can provide some insights to other countries with similar needs and priority.
Rapid growth in pharmaceutical spending is a major challenge in Canada. To control rising costs, the Canadian government implemented a generic pricing policy in 2013, which reduced prices for some prescription generic drugs by roughly 50 percent. This paper explores the effects of the Canadian pricing policy on drug expenditures and drug utilization among seniors.
Methods
Using a unique prescription claims data, this paper adopts a difference-in-differences methodology to estimate the policy effects, and further investigates the mechanisms by exploring the demand-side incentives and the role of health insurance design with a triple-difference approach.
Results
Exploiting the policy variation across drugs and provinces, my results suggest that the policy has reduced drug expenditure per capita, largely due to the inelastic demand among seniors. Although the policy leads to lower out-of-pocket costs for seniors facing co-insurance than for those with a fixed co-payment, individual utilization and total demand display no differences across cost-sharing.
Conclusions
The price regulation in Canada was successful in reducing drug expenditures per capita. The success rests on the interaction with demand-side regulations and demand incentives. The evidence of cost containment in Canada can provide some insights to other countries with similar needs and priority.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Value in Health |
Publication status | Published Online - 24 Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- Pharmaceutical Expenditures
- Generic Price Regulation Policy
- Cost-sharing Policy
- Prescriptions Demand