The authors regret that few of details published in Table 1 are incorrect. Below is the correct table. The text in the article regarding AGREE II was specified to be used to assess quality of existing CPGs before they were considered for adaptation/adopttion in “four papers [29,31,35,36].” Should be 10 papers [28-31,33-36,38,39]. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
ASJC Scopus subject areas