TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Effects of novel rotary-abrasive finishing pad textures on the controlled 2-body abrasive wear of Type 304 stainless steel” [Wear 348–349 (15 February 2016) 89–97](S0043164815004949)(10.1016/j.wear.2015.11.018)
AU - Zhou, Yuchen
AU - Axinte, Dragos
AU - Butler-Smith, Paul
AU - Jessen, Estella
AU - Norbygaard, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
PY - 2017/2/15
Y1 - 2017/2/15
N2 - In the article above, both Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 3(b) have shown the image of saw tooth abrasive grits employed in the test. However, these two images of saw tooth grits were inadvertently mixed with the images taken in the same research group for a different project. The Figures have now been replaced with the new images of saw tooth grits as shown below. So, please proceed by changing Figs. 1 and 3 in the paper with those that have been provided below. Besides this, as generation of saw tooth grits is based on some previous work, the citation [17] is added to Section 2 (see below – Investigatory idea and concept). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The added reference and where to insert it are shown below: Added reference: 17. M. Pacella, D. A. Axinte, P. W. Butler-Smith, P. Shipway, M. Daine, C. Wort, An assessment of the wear characteristics of microcutting arrays produced from polycrystalline diamond and cubic boron nitride composites, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Trans. ASME 138 (2), 2016, 021001. Where the reference needs to be added: 2. Investigatory idea and concept In order to fully exploit the advantages of the grinding pad with controlled features, it is important to understand how the workpiece surface roughness and wear responds to different grit geometries. In this study, the generic design of the engineered grinding pad is based on small hexagonal abrasive elements (Fig. 1a) upon the Struers MD-Piano concept. The test setup is inverted, as the positions of workpiece material and abrasive tools were reversed (Fig. 1a). Into these hexagonal features two types of abrasive grits (Fig. 1c) which either have symmetric cutting edges (e.g. square frustum) or asymmetric cutting edges (e.g. saw tooth [17]), which enables…...
AB - In the article above, both Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 3(b) have shown the image of saw tooth abrasive grits employed in the test. However, these two images of saw tooth grits were inadvertently mixed with the images taken in the same research group for a different project. The Figures have now been replaced with the new images of saw tooth grits as shown below. So, please proceed by changing Figs. 1 and 3 in the paper with those that have been provided below. Besides this, as generation of saw tooth grits is based on some previous work, the citation [17] is added to Section 2 (see below – Investigatory idea and concept). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. The added reference and where to insert it are shown below: Added reference: 17. M. Pacella, D. A. Axinte, P. W. Butler-Smith, P. Shipway, M. Daine, C. Wort, An assessment of the wear characteristics of microcutting arrays produced from polycrystalline diamond and cubic boron nitride composites, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., Trans. ASME 138 (2), 2016, 021001. Where the reference needs to be added: 2. Investigatory idea and concept In order to fully exploit the advantages of the grinding pad with controlled features, it is important to understand how the workpiece surface roughness and wear responds to different grit geometries. In this study, the generic design of the engineered grinding pad is based on small hexagonal abrasive elements (Fig. 1a) upon the Struers MD-Piano concept. The test setup is inverted, as the positions of workpiece material and abrasive tools were reversed (Fig. 1a). Into these hexagonal features two types of abrasive grits (Fig. 1c) which either have symmetric cutting edges (e.g. square frustum) or asymmetric cutting edges (e.g. saw tooth [17]), which enables…...
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010850242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.050
DO - 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.050
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85010850242
SN - 0043-1648
VL - 372-373
SP - 216
EP - 217
JO - Wear
JF - Wear
ER -