TY - JOUR
T1 - Are vowels and consonants processed differently? event-related potential evidence with a delayed letter paradigm
AU - Carreiras, Manuel
AU - Gillon-Dowens, Margaret
AU - Vergara, Marta
AU - Perea, Manuel
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - To investigate the neural bases of consonant and vowel processing, event-related potentials(ERPs) were recorded while participants read words and pseudowords in a lexical decision task. The stimuli were displayed in three different conditions:(i) simultaneous presentation of all letters(baseline condition);(ii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal consonants were delayed for 50 msec(consonants-delayed condition); and(iii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal vowels were delayed for 50 msec(vowels-delayed condition). The behavioral results showed that, for words, re sponse times in the consonants-delayed condition were longer than in the vowels-delayed condition, which, in turn, were longer than in the baseline condition. The ERPs showed that, starting as early as 150 msec, words in the consonants-delayed condition produced a larger negativity than words in vowels delayed condition. In addition, there were peak latency differences and amplitude differences in the P150, N250, P325, and N400 components between the baseline and the two letter delayed conditions. We examine the implications of these findings for models of visual-word recognition and reading.
AB - To investigate the neural bases of consonant and vowel processing, event-related potentials(ERPs) were recorded while participants read words and pseudowords in a lexical decision task. The stimuli were displayed in three different conditions:(i) simultaneous presentation of all letters(baseline condition);(ii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal consonants were delayed for 50 msec(consonants-delayed condition); and(iii) presentation of all letters, except that two internal vowels were delayed for 50 msec(vowels-delayed condition). The behavioral results showed that, for words, re sponse times in the consonants-delayed condition were longer than in the vowels-delayed condition, which, in turn, were longer than in the baseline condition. The ERPs showed that, starting as early as 150 msec, words in the consonants-delayed condition produced a larger negativity than words in vowels delayed condition. In addition, there were peak latency differences and amplitude differences in the P150, N250, P325, and N400 components between the baseline and the two letter delayed conditions. We examine the implications of these findings for models of visual-word recognition and reading.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59949098032&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/jocn.2008.21023
DO - 10.1162/jocn.2008.21023
M3 - Article
C2 - 18510451
AN - SCOPUS:59949098032
SN - 0898-929X
VL - 21
SP - 275
EP - 288
JO - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
JF - Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
IS - 2
ER -