TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of consultants' NHS and private incomes in England in 2003/4
AU - Morris, Stephen
AU - Elliott, Bob
AU - Ma, Ada
AU - McConnachie, Alex
AU - Rice, Nigel
AU - Skåtun, Diane
AU - Sutton, Matt
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was funded by the Department of Health
PY - 2008/7/1
Y1 - 2008/7/1
N2 - Objective: Consultants employed by the NHS in England are allowed to undertake private practice to supplement their NHS income. Until the introduction of a new contract from October 2003, those employed on full-time contracts were allowed to earn private incomes no greater than 10% of their NHS income. In this paper we investigate the magnitude and determinants of consultants' NHS and private incomes. Design: Quantitative analysis of financial data. Setting: A unique, anonymized, non-disclosive dataset derived from tax returns for a sample of 24,407 consultants (92.3% of the total) in England for the financial year 2003/4. Main outcome methods: The conditional mean total, NHS and private incomes earned by age group, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. Results: The mean annual total, NHS and private incomes across all consultants in 2003/4 were £110,773, £76,628 and £34,144, respectively. Incomes varied by age, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. The ratio of mean private to NHS income for consultants employed on a full-time contract was 0.26. The mean private income across specialties ranged from £5,144 (for paediatric neurology) to £142,723 (plastic surgery). There was a positive association between mean private income and NHS waiting lists across specialties. Conclusions: Consultants employed on full-time contracts on average exceeded the limits on private income stipulated by the 10% rule. Specialty is a more important determinant of income than the region in which the consultant works. Further work is required to explore the association between mean private income and waiting lists.
AB - Objective: Consultants employed by the NHS in England are allowed to undertake private practice to supplement their NHS income. Until the introduction of a new contract from October 2003, those employed on full-time contracts were allowed to earn private incomes no greater than 10% of their NHS income. In this paper we investigate the magnitude and determinants of consultants' NHS and private incomes. Design: Quantitative analysis of financial data. Setting: A unique, anonymized, non-disclosive dataset derived from tax returns for a sample of 24,407 consultants (92.3% of the total) in England for the financial year 2003/4. Main outcome methods: The conditional mean total, NHS and private incomes earned by age group, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. Results: The mean annual total, NHS and private incomes across all consultants in 2003/4 were £110,773, £76,628 and £34,144, respectively. Incomes varied by age, type of contract, specialty and region of place of work. The ratio of mean private to NHS income for consultants employed on a full-time contract was 0.26. The mean private income across specialties ranged from £5,144 (for paediatric neurology) to £142,723 (plastic surgery). There was a positive association between mean private income and NHS waiting lists across specialties. Conclusions: Consultants employed on full-time contracts on average exceeded the limits on private income stipulated by the 10% rule. Specialty is a more important determinant of income than the region in which the consultant works. Further work is required to explore the association between mean private income and waiting lists.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649120427&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080004
DO - 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080004
M3 - Article
C2 - 18591691
AN - SCOPUS:49649120427
SN - 0141-0768
VL - 101
SP - 372
EP - 380
JO - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
JF - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
IS - 7
ER -