A critique of PISA and what Jullien’s plan might offer

Katherine Forestier, Bob Adamson

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adopting a comparative perspective to address educational issues in different contexts was a hallmark of Jullien’s work in the early-nineteenth century. Different emphases and approaches to comparative education methodology have emerged in recent times thanks to major developments in technology, but have these changes rendered Jullien’s ideas redundant? This paper looks at the current predominant methodology in comparative studies of curriculum by critiquing the instruments of the Programme for International Student Assessment. Some pitfalls of comparing through a focus on student learning outcomes in defined subjects are discussed. The paper concludes by looking at how Jullien’s Plan might offer ways of addressing some of the modern challenges and opportunities facing comparative research methodology in curriculum studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-373
Number of pages15
JournalCompare
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • assessment
  • comparative education history
  • Curriculum design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critique of PISA and what Jullien’s plan might offer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this