Abstract
Although previous studies have explored the financial benefits of improved supply chain transparency, in practice, firms extensively conceal their information. The existing literature pays very limited attention to how a firm's supply chain transparency affects the financial support from suppliers. Grounded on social exchange theory, this study explores the reciprocal relationship between a firm's supply chain transparency and its suppliers’ provision of trade credit in the context of supplier list disclosures. Based on tests of Chinese listed firms, we find that a firm with lower supply chain transparency can enjoy more trade credit. We further observe that this negative relationship is attenuated by a firm's market share but strengthened by a firm's corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. These findings contribute to an improved understanding of the combined effects of reciprocity and bargaining power on trade credit. Our results also provide a new rationale for a firm to conceal supplier identities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 113404 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Research |
| Volume | 155 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Free Keywords
- CSR performance
- Market share
- Social exchange relationship
- Supplier list disclosure
- Supply chain transparency
- Trade credit
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Marketing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Who pays buyers for not disclosing supplier lists? Unlocking the relationship between supply chain transparency and trade credit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver