Abstract
Research Summary: This study examines whether different entrepreneurship subsidies signal initial public offering (IPO) firms' quality to external investors. We employ a quasi-natural experiment by exploiting the exogenous, staggered introduction of “Eight-Point Code” inspections to Chinese provinces, which anticorruption campaign impacts how subsidies match firm quality. Based on a difference-in-differences analysis of 584 IPOs, we find that research and development (R&D) subsidies match highly innovative firms regardless of government corruption, but investors interpret R&D subsidies as a quality signal only when government corruption is low. High-growth subsidies match high-growth firms only when government corruption is low; however, investors do not interpret high-growth subsidies as a quality signal regardless of government corruption. Our study contributes by examining subsidy–firm matching and investors' interpretations to isolate the signaling effect of entrepreneurship subsidies. Managerial Summary: Do initial public offering (IPO) investors interpret different entrepreneurship subsidies as signals of entrepreneurial firms' quality? We find that when government corruption is high, research and development (R&D) subsidies are matched to high-quality firms, but high-growth (HG) subsidies are not; nevertheless, because of dubious subsidy–firm matching under high corruption, neither R&D nor HG subsidies signal firm quality to IPO investors. When government corruption is low, both R&D and HG subsidies are matched to high-quality firms; however, because of the distinct nature of innovation and growth, IPO investors interpret only R&D subsidies as a signal of quality, ignoring HG subsidies. Our findings suggest that investors' interpretations of entrepreneurship subsidies depend on subsidy type as well as subsidy–firm matching under different anticorruption regulations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 633-670 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Free Keywords
- anticorruption
- high-growth subsidies
- initial public offering
- R&D subsidies
- signaling
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Economics and Econometrics
- Strategy and Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The signaling effect of entrepreneurship subsidies on initial public offering investor valuation: An anticorruption campaign as a quasi-natural experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver