Abstract
Objectives: In this article, we critically review the development and implementation of COVID-19 vaccination in Singapore and China during the pandemic. Methods: We collect and analyze data from a range of sources, including scholarly articles, statistics and documents from national governments in the two countries, and reports from international organizations. Results: There are important differences in the two countries’ approaches to the evolving pandemic, and thus the roles that COVID-19 vaccination plays in the overall response strategies in these two countries. Conclusions: Whereas Singapore adopted a “living with the virus” strategy, China continued to pursue a COVID-zero strategy. The overall COVID-19 response strategy of Singapore was largely shared by many countries in the world, while that of China was more unique and hardly imitated elsewhere. Nevertheless, vaccination played a significant role in both countries’ responses to the pandemic. A comparison and contrast between the vaccination processes in these two countries thus shed important light on the drivers and outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in different settings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100620 |
| Journal | Health Policy and Technology |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Free Keywords
- COVID-zero strategy
- Domestic vaccine production capacity
- Living with COVID
- Population density
- Vaccine rollouts
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biomedical Engineering
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of vaccines in COVID-19 control strategies in Singapore and China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver