The effect of recommendation display position on review persuasiveness: Moderating roles of temporal distance, affect, and valence

Subhash Jha, M. S. Balaji, Abhijit Guha, Abhijit Biswas, Eric W.K. See-To, Prashanth Ravula

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines how the display position of the recommendation (e.g., “I recommend…”) in a positive review influences its persuasiveness. Specifically, we propose that recommendations displayed at the top (vs. bottom) of positive reviews are more persuasive, because displaying the recommendation at the top (vs. bottom) increases processing fluency and thus increases review persuasiveness. The observed effects are mitigated (i) when the temporal distance associated with the decision increases, (ii) for relatively cognitive decisions, and (iii) when the review valence is negative. We test the above propositions across multiple experimental studies and across differing types of recommendations. This research proposes contributions not only to theory relating to online reviews, display effects, and processing fluency but also to practice, namely, how firms should elicit and display recommendations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Retailing
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Display effects
  • Fluency
  • Recommendations
  • Review persuasiveness
  • Verticality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of recommendation display position on review persuasiveness: Moderating roles of temporal distance, affect, and valence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this