Abstract
This study compares U.S. firm international strategies between two starkly different industries. We find that firms are more inclined to adopt global strategies in the integrated global industry than in the multidomestic industry. The global strategy does not seem to be effective unless a firm possesses substantial intangible assets. R&D-based intangible assets play a more significant role than marketing-based intangible assets in both the integrated global industry and (to a lesser extent) the multidomestic industry. Additionally, internationalization pace has a positive direct impact, and a negative interaction effect with the global strategy on firm performance in the integrated global industry.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Regional Aspects of Multinationality and Performance |
| Editors | Alan Rugman |
| Pages | 263-296 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | Research in Global Strategic Management |
|---|---|
| Volume | 13 |
| ISSN (Print) | 1064-4857 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the Global and Regional Strategies of Multinational Enterprises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver