Societal Trust and Modified Audit Opinions: International Evidence

Zabihollah Rezaee, Donghe Yang, Gaoguang Zhou, Jing Zhou, Xindong Zhu

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study examines how societal trust influences auditors’ likelihood of issuing modified audit opinions. Analyzing cross-country data, we find that auditors in countries with high levels of societal trust are less prone to issue modified audit opinions. Specifically, our findings indicate that this effect is moderated by formal audit-related institutions, such as heightened auditor liabilities, the presence of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections, and a more advanced audit profession. These results are consistent even when applying a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach. Further analysis shows that the moderating impact of formal institutions is more pronounced for clients operating domestically, clients of non-Big N auditors, and auditors with long tenure. Overall, our findings highlight societal trust as a significant informal institution influencing auditor opinions, with a complex interplay between this trust and formal audit-related institutions. The study offers important implications for policy, practice, and future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-130
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of International Accounting Research
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • auditor reporting conservatism
  • formal institutions
  • societal trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Societal Trust and Modified Audit Opinions: International Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this