Abstract
This article first examines the coverage of SARS by Focus with a view to examining whether there really was a 'breakthrough' for TV current affairs programmes in China in the coverage of SARS after two decades of reform that has greatly increased the power of the market relative to the old political imperatives. The article then explores why Focus, as a product of reform, has failed audiences' expectations. The article concludes that TV current affairs programmes in China have been exploited to play a key role in shaping public discourse and creating a social or psychological climate favourable for political stability, and at times of crisis has far less freedom than usual to violate the guidelines set down by the state. Focus will remain as 'an example' of media supervision for other TV current affairs programmes in China and for the outside world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 715-737 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Media, Culture and Society |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Free Keywords
- Formal democracy
- Investigative journalism
- Media supervision
- Political and social stability
- Sensitive topics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reading between the headlines: SARS, Focus and TV current affairs programmes in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver