Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Personalized Environmental Control Systems (PECS): Systematic review of benefits for thermal comfort, air quality, health, and human performance

  • Dolaana Khovalyg*
  • , Mariya P. Bivolarova
  • , Jun Shinoda
  • , Douaa Al-Assaad
  • , Marika Vellei
  • , Karol Bandurski
  • , Giorgia Chinazzo
  • , Ongun B. Kazanci
  • , Joyce Kim
  • , Tobias Kramer
  • , Aleksandra Lipczynska
  • , Shichao Liu
  • , Wilmer Pasut
  • , Rajan Rawal
  • , Chandra Sekhar
  • , Ruiji Sun
  • , Zhibin Wu
  • , Alireza Afshari
  • , Pablo Martinez-Alcaraz
  • , Maíra André
  • Touraj Ashrafian, Pedro de la Barra, Mateus Bavaresco, Katharina Boudier, Chungyoon Chun, Joon Ho Choi, Adrian Chong, Sarah Crosby, Renata De Vecchi, Ricardo Forgiarini Rupp, Matteo Favero, Natalia Giraldo Vasquez, Matheus Geraldi, Veronica Martins Gnecco, Akshit Gupta, Sabine Hoffmann, Wooyoung Jung, Meng Kong, Minyoung Kwon, Giulia Lamberti, Yoonhee Lee, Alessandra Luna-Navarro, Fatemeh Nabilou, Larissa Pereira de Souza, Ilaria Pigliautile, Anna Laura Pisello, Kai Rewitz, Roberto Rugani, Sasan Sadrizadeh, Peter Simmonds, Andrew Sonta, Marc Syndicus, Fatih Topak, Giulia Torriani, Luca Zaniboni
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Advances in environmental technologies have improved indoor environmental quality (IEQ) by creating steady, uniform conditions. However, these often fail to meet individual thermal comfort and air quality needs, prompting a shift toward adaptive, personalized solutions. Personalized Environmental Control Systems (PECS) aim to enhance comfort, air quality, health, and productivity through user-centered designs. This paper systematically reviews 324 journal articles on PECS from 1988-2023, focusing on thermal and indoor air quality (IAQ) domains. PECS are classified by mobility: building-attached, semi-attached, detached, and wearable. The review assesses their impact on thermal comfort, IAQ, health outcomes (e.g., Sick Building Syndrome, heat stress), and human performance (e.g., cognitive function, productivity). Results show that building-detached PECS often improve thermal sensation, comfort, and acceptability, with combined systems yielding better ratings. Personalized ventilation enhances IAQ by delivering clean air directly to the breathing zone, reducing contaminant exposure. Research on PECS effects on health is limited, mainly focusing on short-term, controlled studies. Evidence for benefits on human performance is sparse but promising. Key challenges include inconsistent performance metrics, limited real-world evaluations, and potential publication bias toward positive results. This review highlights the need for standardized evaluation methods, deeper understanding of combined PECS effects, real-world and long-term testing, and clearer quantification of human performance benefits to advance the field.

Original languageEnglish
Article number113541
JournalBuilding and Environment
Volume286
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Free Keywords

  • Air Quality
  • Health and Productivity
  • Human
  • PECS
  • Personalized Environment
  • Thermal Comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personalized Environmental Control Systems (PECS): Systematic review of benefits for thermal comfort, air quality, health, and human performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this