Abstract
We consider the use of difference in differences (DD) to evaluate the effect of an activity assistance program on the health of severely disabled Koreans. There are, however, 2 problems in the data: the number of response categories for self-assessed health changed over the waves of the repeated cross-section survey and the “parallel untreated response path” assumption for DD is suspect. We show how to overcome these problems by renormalizing parameters and applying “generalized difference in differences (GDD).” We find a significantly positive effect of the program with DD, but not with GDD. Our solutions should prove useful in applications in which one or other of these problems arise.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1123-1131 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Health Economics (United Kingdom) |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Free Keywords
- difference in differences
- generalized difference in differences
- ordinal response
- self-assessed health
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ordinal response generalized difference in differences with varying categories: The health effect of a disability program in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver