Modified PI controller with improved steady-state performance and comparison with PR controller on direct matrix converters

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a modified proportional-integral (PI) controller and compares it with a proportional-resonant (PR) controller. These controllers are tested on a three-phase direct matrix converter (MC). The modified PI controller involves current feedforward together with space vector modulation (SVM) to control the MC output currents. This controller provides extra control flexibility in terms of the current error reduction, and it gives improved steady-state tracking performance. When the coefficient of current feedforward is equal to the load resistor (K = R), the steady-state error is effectively minimized even when regulating sinusoidal variables. The total harmonic distortion is also reduced. In order to comparatively evaluate the modified PI controller, a PR controller is designed and tested. Both the modified PI and PR controllers are implemented in the natural frame (abc) in a straightforward manner. This removes the coordinate transformations that are required in the stationary (αβ) and synchronous (dq) reference frame based control strategies. In addition, both controllers can handle the unbalanced conditions. The experimental and simulation results verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed controllers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-66
Number of pages14
JournalChinese Journal of Electrical Engineering
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Free Keywords

  • AC-AC conversion
  • Matrix converter
  • PI controller
  • PR controller
  • Steady-state error

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modified PI controller with improved steady-state performance and comparison with PR controller on direct matrix converters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this