Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Metanarrative Polyvocality, New Historical Fiction, and Discourses of Violence: Towards a Narratology of Xue Mo's Spiritual Realism

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

This presentation focuses on Curses of the Kingdom of Xixia (2010) and Wild Fox Ridge (2014) by Xue Mo, two novels that followed the Desert Trilogy and which mark a significant transition in his style and narrative construction. Through such artistic innovations and writerly transformation, Xue Mo contributes to the emergence of a unique narrative form that blends traditional and modern Chinese literary modes with contemporary artistic experimentation to reveal, reclaim, and explore local Chinese culture. This presentation presents preliminary ideas on developing a new critical framework for describing and interpreting the distinguishing narrative features of Xue Mo’s spiritual realism so that we can better understand his literary experimentation and unique contribution to an emerging Chinese postsecularism. A significant innovation is the creation of a new critical term called spiritual realism which is distinguished from magical realism.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2026
EventXue Mo Dialogue Forum -
Duration: 16 Aug 2026 → …

Conference

ConferenceXue Mo Dialogue Forum
Period16/08/26 → …

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Free Keywords

  • Xue Mo
  • Xixia
  • Wild Fox Ridge
  • magical realism
  • spiritual realism
  • polyvocality
  • metafiction
  • metanarrative
  • postsecularism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Metanarrative Polyvocality, New Historical Fiction, and Discourses of Violence: Towards a Narratology of Xue Mo's Spiritual Realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this