Abstract
This article revisits Erving Goffman’s concept of the total institution to analyse how local staff experience work in a peace operation base. Drawing on interviews with former Afghan employees of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), it shows that although local staff are not physically confined, they are subjected to practices that mirror those faced by Goffman’s ‘inmates’. The article argues that in peace operation bases, roles are inverted: local staff, though mobile, are regulated, while international staff retain authority. This inversion reveals how power, rather than confinement, produces institutional effects and calls for closer attention to exclusions in peace operations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published Online - 26 Mar 2026 |
Free Keywords
- Afghanistan
- Erving Goffman
- ISAF
- local staff
- peace operation
- Total institution
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Political Science and International Relations
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Inverting Goffman's Total Institution: Local Staff and Everyday Exclusion in Peace Operations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver