Abstract
Generally there are two primary types of assessment approaches for evaluating the environmental impact of the built environment (BE): qualitatively based building rating systems and quantitatively based material & energy accounting methods. Their respective strengths and inadequacies are often discussed and compared in the literature. However, empirical analysis is not used for such comparisons. This study applies both approaches to the BE at neighbourhood scale. The case study focuses on China's Small residential district (SRD). The objective is to understand what additional decision-making information can be generated by using both approaches. It is concluded that the two approaches complement one another and their simultaneous use can generate more decision-making information for various stakeholders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-252 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Free Keywords
- Building rating system
- Chinese small residential district
- Decision information
- Material and energy accounting
- Neighbourhood sustainability
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Sociology and Political Science
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving sustainability decision-making information at neighbourhood level: A new framework for performance assessment based on China's small residential district'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver