Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Harnessing cobalt coordination chemistry for water splitting: molecular design, electronic structure modulation, and catalytic mechanisms

  • Aqsa Irshad
  • , Ali Bahadur*
  • , Mohsin Javed
  • , Rabia Nawaz
  • , Sajid Mahmood
  • , Salah Knani
  • , Shahid Iqbal
  • , Ibrahim Khan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal PublicationReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The growing severity of climate change and rising energy demand for fossil fuels have increased interest in exploring clean energy and renewable sources. Electrochemical water splitting using renewable energy inputs has been considered the most promising approach to producing clean hydrogen (H2). Water splitting involves oxygen evolution (OER) at the anode and hydrogen evolution reactions (HER) at the cathode. Common catalysts for OER and HER are composed of noble metals and non-metals, their alloys, and their compounds, but the high cost, scarcity, and stability of noble metals hinder wider application. To tackle this, cobalt-based complexes have been found to be homogeneous catalysts for both OER and HER, meeting the demand for low overpotentials. Cobalt complexes are highly promising, cost-effective electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting (EC-WS), and they can be precisely tuned both electronically and structurally in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), layered double hydroxides (LDHs), phosphides, chalcogenides, and single-atom catalysts (SACs). Selective tuning of their σ-donors, π-acceptors, and redox-active (non-innocent) ligands gives rise to different and measurable shifts of the cobalt d-band center, of eG orbital filling, and of the Co2+/Co3+/Co4+ redox accessibility, respectively. This review explores the cobalt coordination environment, its donor/acceptor properties, its geometry, its oxidation state, and its nuclearity, and how these affect the three key HER/OER catalytic metrics: overpotential, Tafel slope, and turnover frequency (TOF). An inter-study comparison of various systems reveals that low-cost cobalt catalysts, in particular with optimized coordination environments: multinuclear cubane architectures and dual-site phosphide systems, are as competitive (or more) as IrO2 and RuO2 systems in alkaline OER (best ɳ10 = 157 mV). We further critically assess the synthesis routes, degradation mechanisms (ligand dissociation, cobalt leaching, phase reconstruction), and homogeneous vs. heterogeneous aspects of cobalt catalysts under operating conditions of water splitting. The review ends with quantitative electronic descriptor targets and actionable strategies for scalable synthesis and commercially viable development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number218187
JournalCoordination Chemistry Reviews
Volume566
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Free Keywords

  • Cobalt complexes
  • Coordination chemistry
  • HER
  • Ligand engineering
  • OER

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry
  • Materials Chemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harnessing cobalt coordination chemistry for water splitting: molecular design, electronic structure modulation, and catalytic mechanisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this