TY - JOUR
T1 - GRADE concept paper 9
T2 - rationale and process for creating a GRADE Ontology
AU - Whaley, Paul
AU - Alper, Brian
AU - Dehnbostel, Joanne
AU - Alva-Diaz, Carlos
AU - Antoniou, Stavros
AU - Bognanni, Antonio
AU - Bracchiglione, Javier
AU - Dalsbø, Therese Kristine
AU - Grant, Sean
AU - Hunter, Jennifer
AU - Iorio, Alfonso
AU - Lagisz, Malgorzata
AU - Lehmann, Harold
AU - Li, Sheyu
AU - Meerpohl, Joerg
AU - Mokrane, Saphia
AU - Monaco, Cauê
AU - Neumann, Ignacio
AU - Pottie, Kevin
AU - Sayfi, Shahab
AU - Sekercioglu, Nigar
AU - Singh, Jasvinder
AU - Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
AU - Tufte, Janice
AU - Vasanthan, Lenny Thinagaran
AU - Wang, Li
AU - Xia, Jun
AU - Yao, Xiaomei
AU - Schünemann, Holger
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Context: As the rate of research production accelerates, the ability to efficiently and unambiguously communicate judgments relating to the synthesis, evaluation, and use of scientific information becomes paramount. Perspective: Scientific information can be viewed as a “layered infrastructure” of data, evidence, knowledge, and use. The GRADE approach serves as a de facto data standard for this infrastructure, supporting movement between layers by reducing ambiguity in claims to knowledge (in the form of judgements of certainty in the evidence when answering research questions) and level of commitment to possible solutions to problems (in the form of strength of recommendations for interventions). Purpose: This GRADE concept paper outlines the structure, purpose, and potential benefits of the GRADE Ontology for (a) the creators of, educators in, and users of systematic reviews, health guidelines, and health technology assessments, and (b) the development of tools that help with conducting, finding, and summarising the same. This paper also presents the processes for the development and maintenance of the GRADE Ontology, a formalised terminology standard within GRADE that will support the efficiency, rigour, consistency, and interoperability of GRADE's use. Plain Language Summary: The rate of research production is increasing exponentially. It is therefore becoming increasingly important to quickly, efficiently, and unambiguously communicate the judgments made and processes used when doing research and using evidence to inform policy decisions. GRADE is a widely used approach to assessing certainty of evidence when answering research questions and making recommendations for health interventions, designed to help with the efficient and transparent evaluation and use of evidence. However, the absence of a formalized terminology standard within GRADE limits the efficiency with which the results of its use can be communicated. In response, the GRADE Ontology is being created. This concept paper outlines what an ontology is, how it helps with communicating scientific information, the specific benefits of the GRADE Ontology, and the processes for developing and maintaining a useful, valid ontology that supports the use of the GRADE approach.
AB - Context: As the rate of research production accelerates, the ability to efficiently and unambiguously communicate judgments relating to the synthesis, evaluation, and use of scientific information becomes paramount. Perspective: Scientific information can be viewed as a “layered infrastructure” of data, evidence, knowledge, and use. The GRADE approach serves as a de facto data standard for this infrastructure, supporting movement between layers by reducing ambiguity in claims to knowledge (in the form of judgements of certainty in the evidence when answering research questions) and level of commitment to possible solutions to problems (in the form of strength of recommendations for interventions). Purpose: This GRADE concept paper outlines the structure, purpose, and potential benefits of the GRADE Ontology for (a) the creators of, educators in, and users of systematic reviews, health guidelines, and health technology assessments, and (b) the development of tools that help with conducting, finding, and summarising the same. This paper also presents the processes for the development and maintenance of the GRADE Ontology, a formalised terminology standard within GRADE that will support the efficiency, rigour, consistency, and interoperability of GRADE's use. Plain Language Summary: The rate of research production is increasing exponentially. It is therefore becoming increasingly important to quickly, efficiently, and unambiguously communicate the judgments made and processes used when doing research and using evidence to inform policy decisions. GRADE is a widely used approach to assessing certainty of evidence when answering research questions and making recommendations for health interventions, designed to help with the efficient and transparent evaluation and use of evidence. However, the absence of a formalized terminology standard within GRADE limits the efficiency with which the results of its use can be communicated. In response, the GRADE Ontology is being created. This concept paper outlines what an ontology is, how it helps with communicating scientific information, the specific benefits of the GRADE Ontology, and the processes for developing and maintaining a useful, valid ontology that supports the use of the GRADE approach.
KW - Certainty of evidence
KW - Data standards
KW - Evidence-to-decisions
KW - GRADE approach
KW - Ontology
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015147810
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111921
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111921
M3 - Article
C2 - 40769258
AN - SCOPUS:105015147810
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 187
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
M1 - 111921
ER -