Abstract
Purpose
Drawing upon dynamic capability theory (DCT), this study aims to explore the differing effects of digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth on circular economy (CE) performance, as well as the moderating roles of internal corporate governance represented by the chief technology officer (CTO) presence and external public governance formed through exposure to government agencies.
Design/methodology/approach
Utilizing a sample of 1,030 listed Chinese manufacturing firms between 2011 and 2022, this study constructs a panel dataset and employs the fixed effect model to examine the proposed hypotheses. Various analyses, including self-selection bias correction, endogeneity test and robustness checks, are conducted to verify the reliability of the results.
Findings
The empirical results indicate that digitalization intensity facilitates firms' CE performance, whereas digitalization breadth does not have a significant impact. Furthermore, CTO presence reinforces the influence of both digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth on CE performance, while government agency exposure only positively moderates the effect of digitalization intensity on CE performance.
Originality/value
This study extends the technology management literature by identifying two digitalization investment strategies (i.e. digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth) and exploring their distinct impacts on CE performance. It also contributes to the governance literature and expands the theoretical discourse on DCT by highlighting the significant roles of internal and external governance in facilitating the development of dynamic capabilities.
Drawing upon dynamic capability theory (DCT), this study aims to explore the differing effects of digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth on circular economy (CE) performance, as well as the moderating roles of internal corporate governance represented by the chief technology officer (CTO) presence and external public governance formed through exposure to government agencies.
Design/methodology/approach
Utilizing a sample of 1,030 listed Chinese manufacturing firms between 2011 and 2022, this study constructs a panel dataset and employs the fixed effect model to examine the proposed hypotheses. Various analyses, including self-selection bias correction, endogeneity test and robustness checks, are conducted to verify the reliability of the results.
Findings
The empirical results indicate that digitalization intensity facilitates firms' CE performance, whereas digitalization breadth does not have a significant impact. Furthermore, CTO presence reinforces the influence of both digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth on CE performance, while government agency exposure only positively moderates the effect of digitalization intensity on CE performance.
Originality/value
This study extends the technology management literature by identifying two digitalization investment strategies (i.e. digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth) and exploring their distinct impacts on CE performance. It also contributes to the governance literature and expands the theoretical discourse on DCT by highlighting the significant roles of internal and external governance in facilitating the development of dynamic capabilities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Mar 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Free Keywords
- Digitalization intensity
- Digitalization breadth
- Circular economy performance
- Chief technology officer
- Government agency exposure
- Dynamic capability theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Go deep or go wide? The effects of digitalization intensity and digitalization breadth on manufacturers’ circular economy performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver