Abstract
This research note examined the performance of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) using two calibration methods. The first method, Cross Validation (CV), has been commonly used in the applied literature using GWR. A second criterion selected an optimal bandwidth that corresponded with the smallest spatial error Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test statistic. We find thatthere isa tradeoffbetween addressing spatial autocorrelation and reducing degree of extreme coefficients in GWR. Although spatial autocorrelation can be controlled for by using the LM criterion, a substantial degree of extreme coefficients may remain. However, while the CV approach appears to be less prone to producing extreme coefficients, it may not always attend to the problems that arise in the presence of spatial error autocorrelation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 767-772 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Applied Economics Letters |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Geographically weighted regression bandwidth selection and spatial autocorrelation: An empirical example using Chinese agriculture data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver