Abstract
Since the early 2000s, energy security has appeared frequently in Chinese policy statements. The focus is on security of supply, even if the discourse is becoming more attentive to other dimensions, such as environmental sustainability. Securitization theory can shed light on this specific threat construction and its implications for China and Chinese foreign policy. Applying securitization theory and reviewing existing debates, I show how the construction of an external threat and a focus on securing access to oil downplay other vulnerabilities and contribute to the perception among China's neighbors and others of a Chinese threat, despite new Chinese security discourses to the contrary. I argue that two factors contribute to this threat construction and its resilience: the role of national oil companies and the limited mobilizing power of environmental and climate security discourses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 183-206 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Asian Perspective |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Free Keywords
- China
- Climate security
- Energy security
- Environmental security
- Oil
- Securitization
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Life-span and Life-course Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fueling threats: Securitization and the challenges of Chinese energy policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver