Abstract
A political-economy model is developed to explain why fiscal decentralization may have a non-monotonic effect on FDI inflows through endogenous policies. Too much fiscal decentralization hurts central government incentives, whereas too little fiscal decentralization renders the local governments vulnerable to capture by the protectionist special interest groups. Moreover, the local government's preference for FDI can be endogenously polarized; therefore, a small change in fiscal decentralization across certain threshold values may lead to a dramatic difference in equilibrium FDI inflows. Empirical investigations support the idea that the difference in fiscal decentralization is an important reason for the nine-fold difference in FDI per capita between China and India. Cross-country regression results also support the inverted-U relationship.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 107-123 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
| Volume | 103 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2013 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Free Keywords
- China and India
- FDI
- Fiscal decentralization
- Growth and development
- Sequential lobby
- Technology adoption
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fiscal decentralization, endogenous policies, and foreign direct investment: Theory and evidence from China and India'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver