Abstract
Although the concentration index (CI) and the health achievement index (HAI) have been extensively used, previous studies have relied on bootstrapping to compute the variance of the HAI, whereas competing variance estimators exist for the CI. This paper provides methods of statistical inference for the HAI and compares the available variance estimators for both the CI and the HAI using Monte Carlo simulation. Results for both the CI and the HAI suggest that analytical methods and bootstrapping are well behaved. The convenient regression method gives standard errors close to the other methods, provided the CI is not too large (< 0.2), but otherwise tends to understate the standard errors. In our simulation setting, the improvement from the Newey-West correction over the convenient regression method has mixed evidence when the CI ≤ 0.1 and is modest when the CI > 0.1. Published 2011. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1375-1381 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Health Economics (United Kingdom) |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Free Keywords
- Monte Carlo simulation
- bootstrapping
- concentration index
- health achievement index
- health inequalities
- statistical inference
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health Policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of variance estimators for the concentration and health achievement indices: A Monte Carlo simulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver