Abstract
Building on the challenge–hindrance stressor framework and the job demands–resources model, the present study posits that job-required creativity, a challenge stressor, and role ambiguity, a hindrance stressor, influence employee creativity differently through intrinsic motivation. Specifically, we argue that the indirect relationship between the challenge stressor and creativity through intrinsic motivation exhibits an inverted U-shape, whereas the indirect relationship between the hindrance stressor and creativity through intrinsic motivation exhibits a U-shape. We further identify job resource adequacy as an important moderator that influences the relationships between challenge/hindrance stressors and intrinsic motivation. Our data showed support of these predictions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Academy of Management Proceedings |
| Volume | 2023 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| Event | 83rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2023 - Boston, United States Duration: 4 Aug 2023 → 8 Aug 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management Information Systems
- Management of Technology and Innovation
- Industrial relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Different curvilinear effects of challenge/hindrance stressors on creativity: The role of job resources: THE ROLE OF JOB RESOURCES'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver