Competitive sorption affinity of sulfonamides and chloramphenicol antibiotics toward functionalized biochar for water and wastewater treatment

  • Mohammad Boshir Ahmed
  • , John L. Zhou
  • , Huu Hao Ngo
  • , Wenshan Guo
  • , Md Abu Hasan Johir
  • , Dalel Belhaj

Research output: Journal PublicationArticlepeer-review

218 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Competitive sorption of sulfamethazine (SMT), sulfamethoxazole (SMX), sulfathiazole (STZ) and chloramphenicol (CP) toward functionalized biochar (fBC) was highly pH dependent with maximum sorption at pH ∼4.0–4.25. Equilibrium data were well represented by the Langmuir and Freundlich models in the order STZ > SMX > CP > SMT. Kinetics data were slightly better fitted by the pseudo second-order model than pseudo first-order and intra-particle-diffusion models. Maximum sorptive interactions occurred at pH 4.0–4.25 through H-bonds formations for neutral sulfonamides species and through negative charge assisted H-bond (CAHB) formation for CP, in addition to π-π electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) interactions. EDA was the main mechanism for the sorption of positive sulfonamides species and CP at pH < 2.0. Sorption of negative sulfonamides species and CP at pH > 7.0 was regulated by H-bond formation and proton exchange with water by forming CAHB, respectively. The results suggested fBC to be highly efficient in removing antibiotics mixture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-312
Number of pages7
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume238
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Externally publishedYes

Free Keywords

  • CAHB
  • Electron-donor-acceptor
  • fBC
  • Sorption
  • Sulphonamides

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Competitive sorption affinity of sulfonamides and chloramphenicol antibiotics toward functionalized biochar for water and wastewater treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this