Abstract
This chapter explores how discourses about environmental conflicts have evolved and whether and how they have contributed to transforming security provisions and politics. It shows that the conceptualization of environmental security and the influence of the realist understanding of security have shaped the debate about environmental conflicts. Despite this initial framing, the debate has evolved and has contributed to bringing about a transformation of security practices in which preventive measures have gained relevance, even if traditional security narratives have reappeared, especially in the recent debate on climate change. This process is described through two dynamics: the securitization of climate change and the governmentalization of security. This chapter shows that the transformation of security practices can be conceptualized, adopting a broader understanding of securitization (see chap. 8 by Brzoska; chap. 9 by Oels; chap. 13 by Karafoulidis).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict |
| Subtitle of host publication | Challenges for Societal Stability |
| Editors | Jürgen Scheffran, Michael Brzoska, Hans Günter Brauch, Peter Michael Link, Janpeter Schilling |
| Publisher | Springer Berlin |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Pages | 151-164 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783642286261 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783642286254 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
Publication series
| Name | Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace |
|---|---|
| Volume | 8 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Climate Change and the Environmental Conflict Discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver