Abstract
This paper compares two types of circulatory markings at a double-lane traffic roundabout: the concentric marking scheme and the Alberta marking scheme. The effects of these two marking schemes on drivers' lane choice behavior, delay, and safety, are compared based on data collected from before and after field surveys over a period of 2years. The results showed that the Alberta marking scheme could better balance the traffic flows on the two circulatory lanes, resulting in higher performance levels.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 378-388 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Transportation Engineering |
| Volume | 134 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being -
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Free Keywords
- Comparative studies
- Driver behavior
- Intersections
- Pavement markings
- Traffic control devices
- Traffic delay
- Traffic safety
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Transportation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Circulatory markings at double-lane traffic roundabout: Comparison of two marking schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver